Strategic Patent Planning for Software A Look at Current Patent and Licensing Strategies
| Date: 19 January 2011, 09:08
|
Strategic Patent Planning for Software Companies looks at the current patent and licensing strategies used by successful companies that develop and market software. This book discusses the current status of international patent protection as regards computer-implemented inventions (CII), explains why copyright is inadequate, and describes how patents are being used by Microsoft and the Apache Software Foundation to support a wide range of business objectives. Over the past decade extensions in the scope of patent protection to include computer-implemented inventions have generated controversy, concern, and a great deal of hyperbole. In Europe the debate over ¡°software patents¡± has been bitter and rancorous. Presently the directive to harmonize European patent law with EPO practice faces an uncertain future. In the United States and Japan, however, the debate over software patents has long been over and the influence of software patents in these countries is already being felt. The $521 million which Microsoft was recently ordered to pay to tiny Eolas by a US Federal Court was one of the largest verdicts for patent infringement damages ever. In the United States this is noteworthy so I will repeat it: one of the largest damage amounts for patent infringement ever awarded in the US was the result of a single software patent. While the validity of the Eolas patent is being challenged at the US Patent and Trademark Office Microsoft remains busy defending itself against 30 or so other patent infringement lawsuits. The problems are not limited to Microsoft. Patent holders such as Acacia Research, with a portfolio of patents on digital streaming have pressed claims against a wide range of web site operators and hosts. InterTrust (now jointly owned by Sony and Philips) with an impressive portfolio of patents on Digital Rights Management (DRM) are in a position to substantially influence future web services. Every week, new patents emerge and new licensing agreements, or lawsuits, are announced. Real politik demands that software companies no longer ignore the threats- or the opportunities- provided by patents, but rather deal with them in a systematic and systemic manner. The business approach of this book is highlighted by a comprehensive listing of strategic business objectives which patents can be used to support. Patents despite their dusty back-room reputation are uniquely versatile business tools. Examining the patent strategies employed by others is a good way of learning to understand the needs of your own company and how you too can use patents to gain and maintain competitive advantages. Thus the bulk of this document looks at two opposite ends of the software patent spectrum by examining the patent strategies of Microsoft Corporation and the Apache Software Foundation. Included are discussions and observations regarding Microsoft¡¯s recently announced FAT and Office Schema licensing programs. There is also a surprising result from the comparison of Microsoft¡¯s XML patent license and the recently updated Apache software license. For small developers, free software may cost them more than they think.
|
DISCLAIMER:
This site does not store Strategic Patent Planning for Software A Look at Current Patent and Licensing Strategies on its server. We only index and link to Strategic Patent Planning for Software A Look at Current Patent and Licensing Strategies provided by other sites. Please contact the content providers to delete Strategic Patent Planning for Software A Look at Current Patent and Licensing Strategies if any and email us, we'll remove relevant links or contents immediately.
Comments (0)
All
