Voting Paradoxes and Group Coherence: The Condorcet Efficiency of Voting Rules (Studies in Choice and Welfare) - ISBN:3642031064

Voting Paradoxes and Group Coherence: The Condorcet Efficiency of Voting Rules (Studies in Choice and Welfare)

Date: 21 November 2010, 06:26

Free register and download UseNet downloader, then you can FREE Download from UseNet.

Download without Limit " Voting Paradoxes and Group Coherence: The Condorcet Efficiency of Voting Rules (Studies in Choice and Welfare) " from UseNet for FREE!

Voting Paradoxes and Group Coherence: The Condorcet Efficiency of Voting Rules (Studies in Choice and Welfare)
Springer; 1st Edition. edition (November 29, 2010) | ISBN: 3642031064 | 350 pages | PDF | 2.3 MB

The likelihood of observing Condorcet's Paradox is known to be very low for elections with a small number of candidates if voters’ preferences on candidates reflect any significant degree of a number of different measures of mutual coherence. This reinforces the intuitive notion that strange election outcomes should become less likely as voters’ preferences become more mutually coherent. Similar analysis is used here to indicate that this notion is valid for most, but not all, other voting paradoxes. This study also focuses on the Condorcet Criterion, which states that the pairwise majority rule winner should be chosen as the election winner, if one exists. Representations for the Condorcet Efficiency of the most common voting rules are obtained here as a function of various measures of the degree of mutual coherence of voters’ preferences. An analysis of the Condorcet Efficiency representations that are obtained yields strong support for using Borda Rule.

MY LINKS

DEAD LINKS ! please PM me
NO MIRRORS PLEASE, RESPECT THE RULES-->

Download Links:

Download Link (High Speed Download)

Download Link (http://www.filesonic.com/...3642031064.pdf)

Related Articles:
Coherence Voting Welfare Efficiency Studies

DISCLAIMER:

This site does not store Voting Paradoxes and Group Coherence: The Condorcet Efficiency of Voting Rules (Studies in Choice and Welfare) on its server. We only index and link to Voting Paradoxes and Group Coherence: The Condorcet Efficiency of Voting Rules (Studies in Choice and Welfare) provided by other sites. Please contact the content providers to delete Voting Paradoxes and Group Coherence: The Condorcet Efficiency of Voting Rules (Studies in Choice and Welfare) if any and email us, we'll remove relevant links or contents immediately.