Sign In | Not yet a member? | Submit your article
 
Home   Technical   Study   Novel   Nonfiction   Health   Tutorial   Entertainment   Business   Magazine   Arts & Design   Audiobooks & Video Training   Cultures & Languages   Family & Home   Law & Politics   Lyrics & Music   Software Related   eBook Torrents   Uncategorized  
Letters: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

The Supreme Court and Election Law: Judging Equality from Baker v. Carr to Bush v. Gore
The Supreme Court and Election Law: Judging Equality from Baker v. Carr to Bush v. Gore
Date: 13 April 2011, 04:35

Free Download Now     Free register and download UseNet downloader, then you can FREE Download from UseNet.

    Download without Limit " The Supreme Court and Election Law: Judging Equality from Baker v. Carr to Bush v. Gore " from UseNet for FREE!
Product Description:
"A must-read for anyone interested in the intersection of law and politics. . . . [Hasen’s] is an important framework against which election law scholars will react and upon which they will build for some time to come."
—Michigan Law Review
"Hasen wrote this concise but substantive volume to assess the history, at least since 1901, of the Supreme Court's intervention in the political process."
—The Law and Politics Book Review
In the wake of the 2000 Florida election controversy, many Americans have questioned whether and how the Supreme Court should decide election law disputes. In the first comprehensive study of the issue since the Supreme Court decided Bush v. Gore, Richard L. Hasen rethinks the Supreme Court's role in regulating elections.
Hasen, drawing on the case files of Supreme Court Justices in the Warren, Burger, and Rehnquist courts, roots the Supreme Court's intervention in political process cases to the 1962 case Baker v. Carr, in which the Court first agreed to consider claims that a state legislature had violated the Constitution by failing to draw legislative districts with equal populations. The case opened the courts to a variety of election law disputes, to the point that the courts now control and direct major aspects of the American electoral process.
The Supreme Court does have a crucial role to play in protecting a socially constructed "core" of political equality principles, concludes Hasen, but it should leave contested questions of political equality to the political process itself. Under this standard, many of the Court's most important election law cases from Baker to Bush have been wrongly decided.

DISCLAIMER:

This site does not store The Supreme Court and Election Law: Judging Equality from Baker v. Carr to Bush v. Gore on its server. We only index and link to The Supreme Court and Election Law: Judging Equality from Baker v. Carr to Bush v. Gore provided by other sites. Please contact the content providers to delete The Supreme Court and Election Law: Judging Equality from Baker v. Carr to Bush v. Gore if any and email us, we'll remove relevant links or contents immediately.



Comments

Comments (0) All

Verify: Verify

    Sign In   Not yet a member?


Popular searches