Sign In | Not yet a member? | Submit your article
 
Home   Technical   Study   Novel   Nonfiction   Health   Tutorial   Entertainment   Business   Magazine   Arts & Design   Audiobooks & Video Training   Cultures & Languages   Family & Home   Law & Politics   Lyrics & Music   Software Related   eBook Torrents   Uncategorized  
Letters: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

The Big Bang Never Happened: A Startling Refutation of the Dominant Theory of the Origin of the Universe
The Big Bang Never Happened: A Startling Refutation of the Dominant Theory of the Origin of the Universe
Date: 15 April 2011, 13:18

Free Download Now     Free register and download UseNet downloader, then you can FREE Download from UseNet.

    Download without Limit " The Big Bang Never Happened: A Startling Refutation of the Dominant Theory of the Origin of the Universe " from UseNet for FREE!
I remember the (greatly simplified for school consumption) story of Kepler and his ellipses replacing the convoluted, yet working, system of epicycles used to explain retrograde and irregular motion in the skies.
I remember the argument being between the "big bang", "steady state" and "oscillating". Big Bang has been winning, but I have been watching in dismay over the years as correction after correction has been plugged into the theory and the equations. When you start having to tweak a fine balance between time frames of superluminal spatial expansion, "real" mass of the neutrino, unobserved-yet-needed for the theory supermassive one-dimensional cosmic strings in order to get just the right homogeneity and 'roughness' of the universe... it starts to feel like epicycles all over again.
Lerner's treatise is pretty nice in spots. I like the presentation of an alternative plasma cosmology. It's not 'extraordinary'; in fact, it's quite ordinary in many ways. Disappointing to the fanciful who want to strap on a Higgs field mass disintegrator in one hundred years, but, like evolution, there's much to be said for what ordinary processes can do, given an extraordinary amount of time to do it in.
I find Lerner's historicopolitical rants informative historically, but he obviously has a lot of big beefs to rant about, and it seemed a bit inappropriate to me to choose so much volume of book to rant in.
Still, it's enough to get the gears going. There are testable hypotheses in alternative cosmologies - once the Big Bang's infallibility complex wanes a bit, then perhaps we can have some proper discussions again, and who knows, perhaps the Big Bang theory will come out stronger for it, but I doubt very much that it will remain unchanged.
Look around the 'Net - there are other valid and interesting critiques of the Big Bang theory around, some with rather interesting implications, should they turn out to be true. The 'Compton Effect' is a *very* interesting possibility that could turn redshifts on their heads. The jury's still out on that for me, but that presents some testable predictions, and some interesting explanations of observations (quasars, for one) and it just boggles my mind to think that perhaps, just perhaps, the universe isn't flying apart quite as fast as it might seem.
I just hope the Big Bang theory stays together long enough for them to discover something nifty and new in the particle accelerators :)

DISCLAIMER:

This site does not store The Big Bang Never Happened: A Startling Refutation of the Dominant Theory of the Origin of the Universe on its server. We only index and link to The Big Bang Never Happened: A Startling Refutation of the Dominant Theory of the Origin of the Universe provided by other sites. Please contact the content providers to delete The Big Bang Never Happened: A Startling Refutation of the Dominant Theory of the Origin of the Universe if any and email us, we'll remove relevant links or contents immediately.



Comments

Comments (0) All

Verify: Verify

    Sign In   Not yet a member?


Popular searches