Date: 22 May 2011, 20:31
|
I had a fantastic time reading Stephenson's latest book. Yes, I found it an extremely long read, but every page contained a wonderful nugget which made the journey worth the effort. Here are two examples of Stephenson's unique ability to whip up a powerful brew of humor, science, and history: "Penn did not take his gaze away from the window, but squinted as if trying to hold back a mighty volume of flatulence, and shifted his focal point to a thousand miles in the distance. But this was coastal Holland and there was nothing out that window save the Curvature of the World" and... "... I am seated near a window that looks out over a canal, and two gondoliers, who nearly collided a minute ago, are screaming murderous threats at each other... The Venetians have even given it a name: 'Canal Rage'." Which isn't to say that the book doesn't have its share of flaws - I'll talk about the two major ones here. First, if you've read Stephenson before, you are undoubtedly aware of his tendency to use 1000 words to do where 100 would have worked just fine. So, sometimes you begin to think "where was the editor?", but most of the time he is able to pull all the threads (long as they are) together into a cohesive, compelling whole. But overall, the extreme length ends up being a plus. The other major flaw stems from Stephenson's seemingly bottomless reservoir of creativity: this book contains not one, not two, but three lead characters. But, you say, you can't have more than one lead character, no? Exactly! All three main characters are compelling in their own way, and you want to keep watching each one grow and change. As was the case with Cryptonomicon, Stephenson could easily have written an entire book just about the character Shaftoe. The Big Question: should you invest the time to read this book (don't worry about the dollar cost - it's inconsequential relative the number of hours you'll invest reading it)? If your answer to any of the following questions is "yes", give it a try: 1) You've read a work by Umberto Ecco and liked it 2) You enjoyed physics class in high school or college 3) You can code 4) You dig binary 5) You always wondered who Newton, Hooke, and Leibniz really were 6) You see tangents as but the arcs of greater circles Go ahead, take the plunge into QuickSilver!
|
DISCLAIMER:
This site does not store QUICKSILVER: A thriller on its server. We only index and link to QUICKSILVER: A thriller provided by other sites. Please contact the content providers to delete QUICKSILVER: A thriller if any and email us, we'll remove relevant links or contents immediately.